Anonymous
My feedback
9 results found
-
1 voteAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
2 votesAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
The problem is not simply one of linking two privacy policies, but that the Ezoic policy is nonsensical. Some of it seems to be addressed to visitors to my site, some addressed to visitors to your site (though the link to it appears on my site and will be clicked on by my visitors, not yours). It's an embarrassment to have it on my site.
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
-
7 votesAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
That's very interesting. Thank you for clarifying that. Because some templates (for instance, those with large graphics at the top) seem less friendly to long horizontal ads at the top than others. And on my site, some templates seem to appear with more ads than others, even though I've allowed five ads on any page. But that might be just what I happen to be seeing at any given time.
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
-
12 votesAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
7 votesAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
4 votesAnonymous
shared this idea
·
The problem is essentially one of audience. If you look at the first section of the statement, "we" and "you" are clearly Ezoic and the Ezoic user, not me and my users, which is nonsensical since it will be my users that will be clicking on the privacy policy to see what my site's policy is, not yours. This sentence, "Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site," will make no sense to them at all. No one is serving ads on their sites. What makes sense as your privacy policy, addressed to me, makes no sense as my privacy policy, addressed to them. Yet when they click on "Privacy Policy" on my site, they expect the latter, not the former.